Expert Answers

Reflection offers you the opportunity to consider how your personal experiences and observations shape your thinking and your acceptance of new ideas.   High-stress levels can negatively affect health. Recall a time when you were under stress and how it impacted your physical and mental health.  The purpose of this essay is to take your reflections on your experience to the next level and start thinking about future growth. Support your experience and recommendations with research. Instructions Carefully follow the instructions and the Grading Rubric for this assignment.  Create a Reflective Essay using a Word Document file. Use APA 7th edition formatting and include a title and reference page. Write a 4 pages double-spaced reflective essay sharing your experiences with how stress can impact mental and physical health and your recommendations on how to cope with stress. Make sure to include the following along with your experience:  Explain why stress occurs.  Give at least 3 reasons. Elaborate on at least 3 biological consequences of stress, emotion, and cognitive outlook on overall health. Explain at least 3 ways stress can help to motivate someone to change their behavior.

Each journal entry is a paragraph on one of the assigned readings, and each entry discusses a different reading assignment.  Each journal entry must include at least one quote from the reading assignment. Select a quote that makes a claim you have an opinion about, explain the quote in the context of the article it came from, and then express your opinion about it. For example, you may think the author is right, or wrong, or leaving out something important, etc. To receive full credit, you must express an opinion and give a reason for that opinion. The goal of the journal entry is NOT to summarize the reading. Rather, the goal is to think about what the reading says, whether on the whole or in some specific part. For example, you could dispute an author's interpretation of an example, critique a particular argument or conclusion, discuss how the author's view applies -- or fails to apply -- to your own experience, relate the material to a TV show or movie, etc.  What you think is up to you, but you must be sharing your own thoughts as opposed to just summarizing or saying generic things like "the author raises profound issues."

Rubric for final paper: Philosophy of Recreation This paper should demonstrate your ability to think critically about theoretical leisure and recreation concepts, and how they influence your views of recreation and its purpose both personally and professionally. Philosophy: the study of the theoretical basis of a particular branch of knowledge or experience. Paper should include: Title Page, page numbers  Introduction  Headings/Subheadings throughout main content  Conclusion References Page properly formatted (at least 2 credible reference sources)  Content of paper:  Philosophy of Recreation and Leisure -Personal Philosophy  --Find parallels between your recreational experiences and philosophical concepts discussed in class and explain how they relate (philosophical concepts: leisure as connection, recreation and mental health, recreation serving a community, leisure and mental health, the value recreation adds to one’s life, tourism and hospitality utilizing leisure, outdoor adventure, value recreation adds to special populations, challenges and risks in recreation, etc.). Personally, what are your feelings on the field of recreation and the value it adds to ones life? What are your views on recreation from a micro stand point…how it impacts individual lives and how it has impacted your life.  --Example: Discuss how the idea of recreation serving a community and meeting needs that no one else meets was impactful for you growing up as this was true of your community.  --Example: Discuss how you have seen personally the positive mental health or physical health impacts of recreation. --Example: Discuss the special population that you or your family are part of and how recreation served a specific benefit for that population.  -Professional Philosophy  --Discuss what you think the roles of recreation and leisure services play for individuals, groups,communities, and society as a whole. You are to do this from the perspective of a professional working in the rec industry, looking at the vocational field of recreation as a whole. Identify the benefits of recreation and leisure for individuals, groups, communities, and society. Be sure to include some of the special populations discussed in class. Look for parallels between social needs and leisure benefits and explain how they relate. For example, your social issue could be obesity, or mental health, then identify the benefit rec/leisure can have on this social issue (i.e., exercise improves mood, joining a community center offers options for physical movement, which decreases obesity, etc.). Who’s job or responsibility is it to meet these needs and provide these services? Where does the funding come from? What kind of training does someone need to provide these services? Is the government responsible? Private companies? Etc.? What value does it add to society? Vocationally, how would you describe the role of recreation in society? What is your philosophy of recreation from a macro standpoint, thinking bigger picture. What impact can it have on larger communities or society as a whole. Who should be funding and administering programs? Who should have access? Is recreation worth investing in? Should programs be non-profit or for profit? --Example: Discuss the benefit of recreation to communities, and who you feel is responsible for funding these programs.  --Example: Discuss what social needs the field of recreation meets for people, and why this an important field for our country and world as a whole.  --Example: Provide evidence that there should be government funding for non-profits providing rec services…OR…provide evidence that it should all be privatized and for profit.

In The Republic, Plato claims that the just society mirrors the state of the soul in a just person. Explain Plato’s position. How does this position lead him to conclude that a kind of meritocracy (rather than democracy) is the ideal form of government? How does Plato’s theory of the forms (and of our knowledge of the forms) influence his theory of the just society?Is Plato correct that meritocracy is ideal form of government? How might someone who disagrees with Plato critique his position? Please present arguments, evidence, and/or examples that support the answers you give. Include direct quotations with accompanying page numbers when citing the text. There is a whole chapter of Platos but I chose the two sections "The Soul" and "The World and the Forms" to send to you because I believe that is where you'll be able to find the answers. If you want me to send over more pictures of pages from Platos chapter like section "Knowledge and Opinion", "The Love of Wisdom", "The State" or "Problems with the Forms" please let me know and I will send them over.  Book is The Great Conversation a historical introduction to philosophy ninth edition. Chapter 8 Plato. A post that receives a grade of “high pass” will be given all ten points. To receive a high pass, your post must demonstrate exceptional understanding of the material, include strong, well-supported arguments, contain original examples/insights, and be written in transparently clear prose. It will contain few (if any) errors of comprehension, unsupported assertions, or hackneyed examples. post that contains more than ten spelling or grammatical errors will automatically receive a failing grade.

Select any issue that has been the subject of protest or propaganda at any time between the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, The Romantic, or Modern eras. Then write a paper detailing the issues of the protest/propaganda, putting the issues in the context of some sort of text or object. The text/object can be a literary or musical work; a sculpture or painting; a building; a symbolic act; or a historical moment. The overarching questions to address in the paper are: What historical forces -- technological, political, cultural -- brought this protested issue or point of propaganda to a critical point at the moment you are looking at? What are the specific arguments being raised in the protest or propaganda? How does your object/text embody these historical forces and detailed arguments?

1. What is *the heterogeneity argument’against hedonism? Shouldwe accept it? If so, why? If not, why not? Answer with reference tcthe main reading by Roger Crisp 2. What is internalism'about well-being? What is its bestformulation and why? Answer with reference to the main readingby Connie Rosati. 3. What is Aristotle's *function argument’ for the view that the lifeof activity according to virtue is the highest human good? Shouldwe accept the argument? Answer with reference to the relevantpassages in Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics. 4.What is the Confucian thesis of well-being familism'? Shouldwe accept it? Answer with reference to the main reading by RichardKim. 5. What is the 'shape of a life hypothesis’? Should we accept it? Ifso. what is its best explanation? If not why not? Answer withreference to the main reading by David Velleman. 6. Does the 'mere difference' view of disability imply that it ispermissible to cause disability? If so, why? If not, why not? Answerwith reference to the main reading bv Elizabeth Barnes 7. Should well-being policy adopt a particular view of well-being?If so, which view and why? If not, why not? Answer with referenceto the main reading by Daniel Haybron and Valerie Tiberius 8.What is the 'rational care theory'of well-being? Should weaccept it? Answer with reference to the main reading by StephenDarwall. 9.What is 'contextualism'about well-being? Should we accept itAnswer with reference to the main reading by Anna Alexandrova

For our first discussion, read all of On Majors, Life, and Studying Philosophy Download On Majors, Life, and Studying Philosophy. Based on your reading (not what Google or ChatGPT says), what is philosophy? What can philosophy do? How can studying philosophy be of benefit to you and to society as a whole? Assess the ideas and assumptions you have about the subject now and contrast them with what you think about it after having completed the reading. Share your ideas! Use at least three (3) quotations in your main post. When you use a quotation, you must follow it up with an in-text citation. This means, "This is your quote." (Chatman 1) In this example, what I put in parentheses there is the in-text citation, and the "1" represents the page number. Then, at the end of what you write in your main post, you should cite your source. For the purposes of this assignment, simply write this: Chatman, Timothy. "On Majors, Life, and Studying Philosophy."

Select one example of Art, Poetry, Music or Philosophy between the periods of the Enlightenment through the Modern era and describe it through examples of one of the other academic mediums learned in this course. That is, within the historic times of the Enlightenment through the Modern eras, select one example that strongly represents that era. Then, select one of the following general topic parings to analyze your subject through:  Art as visual illustration of Philosophy, Literature, or Music Literature as Poetic account of Philosophy, Art, or Music Music as auditory representation of Philosophy, Art, or Literature Philosophy as description of Art, Poetry, or Music

Contrasting Normative Arguments in Standard Form Scenario: In this assignment, you will make two contrasting normative arguments about what one ought to do. Both arguments will be about the same topic; thus, at least one of the arguments will contradict your personal opinion. You will compose the arguments in standard form, as a series of statements that end with your conclusion.

1. Discuss the harm principle (HP) and legal paternalism (LP). Be sure to define both positions and explain the differences between them. 2. Give an example of a law where HP and LP give different verdicts about its legitimacy. 3. Use the example from #2, along with the material we’ve covered in reading and lecture, to argue for a position about which principle (HP or LP) determines the legitimacy of laws. There are really four possible positions you can take in answering #3. a. First, you might argue that HP determines the legitimacy of laws but LP doesn’t; b. Second, you might argue that LP determines the legitimacy of laws but HP doesn’t; c. Third, you might argue that neither HP nor LP determine the legitimacy of laws; d. And fourth, you might argue that both HP and LP determine the legitimacy of laws. 4. Address the best objection you can come up with to the arguments you give in answering #3.