Expert Answers

Summary - Article Takeaway Summary for Be Clear About How Your Team Works Summary - Article Takeaway Summary for Motivation: The Not-So-Secret Ingredient of High Performance Summary - Article Takeaway Summary for Essentials for an Effective Team You are required to select 5 key points (called takeaways) from the articles Takeaway #1 In the box below, you are to do all of the following for your first selected takeaway: (i) Summarize the takeaway in 2-3 sentences, (ii) Categorize the takeaway in terms of how much you agree or disagree with it (you must use one of these categorizations – Strongly Agree, Agree, Somewhat Agree, Somewhat Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree), and (iii) Provide 1-2 sentences explaining why you agreed or disagreed with the takeaway. If you do not provide each of the three components (i, ii, and iii-listed above) for Takeaway #1 below, you will not receive any credit for this takeaway.

Now that you have all your articles reviewed and are informed by the literature, let’s create a statement of the problem. Hint: Use example in the attached Word document as a model to emulate  Complete results section. a.Figure AND Table. Create a graph AND table of your results. Use example in the attached Word document as a model to emulate (do not copy) of a cumulative graph with your own information. Create a table of your results. Use the column information from the example in the attached Word Document. Fill in your information from your 10 articles. b. Written description of results. Describe in narrative format the publication trends over time, variables, investigated, personnel and participants involved, data recorded, methodological features, and general results summarized under different subheads. Use the same subheads as the Sulzer-Azaroff et al. PECS: What do the Data Say article from Week 1 (i.e., Results, Number and Trends of Published Articles, Variables Examined with Purpose, Number of characteristics of participants, Settings, Instructional and research personnel, Materials, Measures, Reliability, Research Designs, Variations in procedures, Procedural fidelity, Duration of and level of IV training and use, Validity and Dependability of the Data). Be sure to use your own words when describing your results. Attached in the Word document is an example of a subhead

You are required to select 5 key points (called takeaways) from each artticle Takeaway #1 In the box below, you are to do all of the following for your first selected takeaway: (i) Summarize the takeaway in 2-3 sentences, (ii) Categorize the takeaway in terms of how much you agree or disagree with it (you must use one of these categorizations – Strongly Agree, Agree, Somewhat Agree, Somewhat Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree), and (iii) Provide 1-2 sentences explaining why you agreed or disagreed with the takeaway. If you do not provide each of the three components (i, ii, and iii-listed above) for Takeaway #1 below, you will not receive any credit for this takeaway.

In an essay discuss: How you have witnessed people overcome their failures to achieve success.

After your initial review of the operations and safety data sheets (SDS), you have determined the sampling you want to perform at Acme Automotive Parts (AAP). The table below lists hazards you want to sample and the sampling/analytical methods you decide to use. You can access the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) methods at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam/default.html and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) methods at https://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/toc.html. Hazard Possible Method Occupational Exposure Limits (OEL) Manganese Fume (Welding) NIOSH 7302 5 mg/m3 (OSHA Ceiling) Copper Fume (Welding) NIOSH 7302 0.1 mg/m3 (OSHA 8-hour TWA) Lead Fume (Welding) NIOSH 7302 0.05 mg/m3 (OSHA 8-hour TWA) 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene (Paint) OSHA 1020 25 ppm (ACGIH 8-hour TWA TLV) Toluene (Paint) OSHA 111 50 ppm (ACGIH 8-hour TWA TLV) Xylene (Paint) OSHA 1002 100 ppm (OSHA 8-hour TWA) Metal Working Fluids NIOSH 5524 0.5 mg/m3 (NIOSH 10-hour TWA REL) Noise (throughout plant) None 90 dBA (OSHA 8-hour TWA) Choose one hazard from the welding area, one hazard from the paint area, and the metal working fluids, and prepare one paragraph for each hazard (three paragraphs in total) answering each of the following questions: Which sampling media will you be using? What flow rate will you use?    How will you calibrate the sampling train?  Calculate the minimum sampling time you will require to be able to detect concentrations at the OELs listed in the table. Show your work in calculating the sampling times. Will you collect personal or area samples? Explain why. Are there any compounds listed in the method that might interfere with your sample? Are there any special storage or shipment requirements for your samples? Prepare one paragraph that concludes how you would evaluate noise exposures in the facility. Discuss what type of sampling instrument you would use, how you would perform calibration, whether you would use personal or area samples, and which areas at the facility you would include in the evaluation. For this assignment, you will use the formula provided in the Sampling Duration section in Chapter 6 of the textbook. You need to find the limit of detection in the sampling method and choose an occupational exposure limit to use the formula. See the PowerPoint presentation in the study guide for an example.

This is a multi-question assignment. MUST BE ON SEPARATE DOCUMENTS Topic 1:  History of Career Counseling For more than 100 years, the field of school counseling has presented a variety of ideas, techniques, and implementation strategies for career counseling. These have evolved because of changes in the industry and workforce demands placed on schools and youth culture. In an essay, address the following: Describe the evolution of career counseling from the early 20th century to today. Explain the evolution of the variety of ideas, techniques, and implementation strategies. Explain the changes in the school counselor’s role in career counseling from the early 20th century to today. Support your essay with two to three scholarly resources. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide Topic 2:  Benchmark - Career Development Career development theories have been presented and discussed for many years. These theories tend to fall into four different categories: trait, psychological, decision, and developmental. Some examples of these theories include but are not limited to Holland’s theory of vocational types, Bandura’s social cognitive theory, Super’s development of self-concept theory, Erikson’s theory of career development, and optimal theory. Using the “Career Development Theories and Models” template (located in the topic Resources), compare three different career development theories or models previously mentioned. 

Organizational design is a formal process of integrating people, information, and technology. Using this definition and the Learning Resources, identify and describe People First San Diego’s organizational design. Explain how the design supports People First San Diego's mission. Explain the importance and function of organizational charts. Then, explain what the People First San Diego organizational chart tells you about the company.  Use the Learning Resources to support your Assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.  1(b)Submit a not including title page and references) in which you address the following: Define organizational culture. Identify elements of the culture at People First San Diego using data from the organization's website. Analyze People First San Diego's location, population served, and demographics of the population and staff using data from the organization's website. With these factors in mind, describe the cultural competencies you would need to work in this organization. As a leader, explain the specific steps you would take to support a culture of equity and inclusion within the organization. Provide examples and draw from the Learning Resources in your explanation.

Utilizing the screening tool, you selected from module 2, you will complete, record, and submit a role-play mock interview with a classmate who has experienced a fictional traumatic event. During the mock interview, please describe the tool, explain the purpose of the tool, and demonstrate your ability to administer the tool with your client. The interview must be video recorded. You will also write a brief (900 – 1100 words) critical self-evaluation of your interview and submit the completed screening tool with your self-evaluation. VIDEO LINK-----> Screening/Assessment Interview and Recorded Role Play Rubric Unsatisfactory Marginal Proficient Exemplary 1 2 3 4 Role Play Interview (25) [EPAS 2022 Advanced 6.2, 7.1] Interview was not recorded or is not available for review and evaluation. (0 points) Interview inconsistently follows the selected tool format; a description of the tool and purpose for use was somewhat demonstrated in a professional manner; verbal and non-verbal clinical engagement skills such as empathy, eye-contact, and conversational pacing are demonstrated at an elementary level of mastery; facilitation skills such as session opening/closing, topic transitions and active listening are demonstrated incompletely or awkwardly. (17.5 points) Interview consistently follows the selected tool format; a description of the tool and purpose for use was partially demonstrated in a professional manner, verbal and non-verbal clinical engagement skills such as empathy, eye-contact, and conversational pacing are demonstrated at a proficient level of mastery; facilitation skills such as session opening/closing, topic transitions and active listening are mostly consistent and demonstrated with thoroughness. (21.25 points) Interview consistently follows selected tool format; a description of the tool and purpose for use was demonstrated in a developmentally appropriate manner, verbal and non-verbal clinical engagement skills such as empathy, eye-contact, and conversational pacing are demonstrated with professionalism and sophisticated mastery; facilitation skills such as session opening/closing, topic transitions and active listening are consistently demonstrated with thoroughness and evident skill, ease and confidence. (25 points) Critical Self-Evaluation (25) [EPAS 2022 Advanced 1.1] Self-evaluation does not meet the target length of 900-1100 words; reflection lacks depth, self-awareness and insight about personal development and professional skills; verbal and non-verbal facilitation skills are not analyzed; no areas for personal improvement are identified or discussed. (0-5 points) Self-evaluation does not meet the target length of 900-1100 words; reflection demonstrates superficial depth, self-awareness and insight about personal development and professional skills; verbal and non-verbal facilitation skills are incompletely analyzed; one area for personal improvement is identified and/or discussed (17.5 point) Self-evaluation meets the target length of 900-1100 words; reflection generally demonstrates depth, self-awareness and insight about personal development and professional skills; verbal and non-verbal facilitation skills are thoroughly analyzed; two or three areas for personal improvement are identified and/or discussed. (21.25 points) Self-evaluation meets the target length of 900-1100 words; reflection demonstrates emotionally sophisticated depth, self-awareness and insight about personal development and professional skills; verbal and non-verbal facilitation skills are thoroughly and thoughtfully analyzed; four or more areas for personal improvement are identified and discussed. (25 points) Screening/Assessment Instrument (15) [EPAS 2022 Advanced 1.5] The selected screening/assessment instrument is not submitted for review (0 points) The selected screening/assessment instrument is submitted for review; is only partially completed; is completed by hand rather than electronically; is summarized/scored incompletely and/or with multiple errors. (10.5 points) The selected screening/assessment instrument is submitted for review; is almost entirely completed; is completed electronically; is summarized/scored completely and almost entirely correctly (12.75 points) The selected screening/assessment instrument is submitted for review; is thoroughly completed; is completed electronically; is summarized/scored completely and correctly (13-15 points) Writing Quality (10) [EPAS 2022 Advanced 1.5] The self-evaluation and screening/assessment instrument have multiple spelling, grammar and/or construction errors on each page. (0 points) The self-evaluation and screening/assessment instrument has several spelling, grammar and/or construction errors on each page. (7 points) The self-evaluation and screening/assessment instrument are written fluently, with no more than a few minor spelling, grammar and/or construction errors throughout. (8.5 points) The self-evaluation and screening/assessment instrument are written fluently and demonstrate sophisticated language use, with no apparent errors. (10 points)

Final Written Presentation, The Capability Approach: Write a Three (3) to no more than four (4) page paper on a country of your choice, primarily focusing on the political and economic system. The purpose of this project is to give you an opportunity to conduct research utilizing Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum’s Theory on the Capability Approach. The written presentation is worth one hundred (100) points possible toward your final grade. You will be required to select a country and focus on the four (4) characteristics that Sen and Nussbaum consider to be important elements for creating a good society. This information can be found in Chapter 1 of the required text, The Good Society, under “Capabilities and the Quality of Life.” It is your choice as to the type of evidence (examples) used to determine whether your country can be considered a good society based on the four (4) characteristics set forth by Sen and Nussbaum (keep in mind, all 4 characteristics) must be assessed. Your paper must include a discussion of the political and economic systems within your selected society and the absence or presence of the four (4) necessary requirements for a good society. In other words, you must include an analysis as to whether your country meets the prerequisites of a good society (including reasons). Examples used to determine what best represents “the capability approach” or the elements of a “good society” is up to you. Your written presentation must show that you have read the assigned book chapters and/or articles, and that you can incorporate this material into your discussion. Your paper must show some expertise of the assigned readings and other scholarly and news media sources. The paper must incorporate (2) ideas from two (2) separate chapters in the assigned reading (including the page numbers), two (2) scholarly sources (from JSTOR only), and two (2) news media sources. In summation, I should find at least 6 citations within your paper, and 5 sources on the reference page (you only need to provide a reference for the required text once, but make sure that you include the page numbers used for the required text). You may only use the same author(s) once for outside scholarly source credit, unless collaborating with others not previously cited. In addition, you may not use the work of any author, who is not listed as such in any book or article that you are using. For example, if Strong and Associates are quoting or using charts or other information in their book by Stephanie Coontz, you cannot claim Strong and Associates as having made the statement or creating the chart. You must find and note the original source or cite Coontz. Your pages must be numbered but use automatic numbering on your computer. Make sure that there are two spaces between each period, and that your paragraphs are the appropriate length (a change in subject matter is a good indicator for a new paragraph). You must use a separate page for the title of your paper, your name, and date (do not include your name or headings on the actual text pages). Please note: the title and reference pages do not counttowards the total number of pages requested. In addition, all books (including your selected pages from the book) and or articles must be referenced in alphabetical order on a separate page (See attached for examples on how to cite authors on the reference page). References must be apparent throughout your paper by using appropriate citations. Make sure that you understand and adhere to the instructions to prevent a loss of five (5) points per missing element, including papers that are difficult to read, and papers with similarity rates higher than 35%. Ten (10) points will be deducted for papers not meeting the required length. Finally, “DIRECT QUOTES” are NOT acceptable in this paper due to the length and will result in a loss of 5 points per incident. Be careful, and make sure that you FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS.

Annotated Reference Assignment The references (and related journal articles) will be due the day before the third class session (June 17, 2024). They can be sent to the instructor via Canvas. This assignment will to familiarize students with issues related to ethical dilemmas in society. Student will locate, review, and evaluate 2 scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles in this area of interest. The articles must have been published in the past (5) five years, and must be from peer-reviewed journals. You should use these articles as a part of your references for your final Ethical Analysis Review Paper. You should include: a summary - a brief description of the essential points made, the scope of the discussion, and the point of view of the author. a critique - your reflections on the significance, strengths, and weaknesses of the article. List your sources using standard APA bibliographic form, with the annotation immediately following each citation. You are expected to provide the instructor copies of the two articles- this should be submitted through Canvas. Annotation Example (permission obtained to share this example from a former student): Article: Graham, S., Depp, C., Lee, E. E., Nebeker, C., Tu, X., Kim, H.-C., & Jeste, D. V. (2019). Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health and Mental illnesses: An overview. Current Psychiatry In The Digital Age Reports, 21(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1094-0???????? Summary: The article focuses on the benefits and potential pitfalls of applying artificial intelligence (AI) in mental health care. By reviewing 28 studies, the authors discovered that utilizing machine learning algorithms to classify mental illnesses could be applicable in the near future. The authors eventually hope that AI technology will be able to assist practitioners to define mental illnesses more objectively than they are written in the DSM-5, tailor treatments towards each individual, and identify mental illnesses at an earlier stage than usual. Specifically, they assert that AI algorithms can be used to enable a better understanding of population-level patterns of mental illnesses as well as provide more intelligent assessments to examine the severity of mental illness. However, they also note that there may be ethical challenges associated with the implementation of AI, such as biased data and the linking of mental illnesses to specific ethnicities. The authors encourage the integration of ethical principles to guide AI research, such as autonomy, beneficence, and justice. Finally, the authors conclude that the future of artificial intelligence in mental health care is promising, and collaboration with stakeholders such as data scientists and other experts is key to integrating such innovation into improved care for patients. Critique: The article strongly notes the potential benefits of applying artificial intelligence technology to mental health care, while also acknowledging the potential ethical dilemmas that can occur. However, the authors could do more to expand the myriad of potential ethical issues that can develop. For instance, the article briefly cites how AI technologies can link mental illnesses to certain ethnicities but doesn’t investigate further the implications of a hypothetical outcome on both patients and clinicians alike. The authors could have done more to expand upon other different populations and socioeconomic backgrounds that could be adversely affected by AI. Further, the authors do not explore the issues of informed consent among patients to have their data used, as well as any potential data privacy implications in the use of AI technology in mental health care. Providing additional context on the potential pitfalls of data privacy with AI and the unintended potential uses of personal information could be helpful in providing a broader view of the ethical conundrums surrounding AI in mental health.