I have attached the instructions below as well as the needed textbook and transcript. (IN AREAS IF Y ...
I have attached the instructions below as well as the needed textbook and transcript. (IN AREAS IF YOU USE SOMETHING FROM THE TRANSCRIPT PLEASE LET ME KNOW WITH A (INSERT TRANSCRIPT CITATION IN YELLOW HIGHLIGHT AND I WILL ADD THE REFERENCE TO THAT) INSTRUCTIONS: In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know. Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs. Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also, discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view. To complete each scenario assignment: 1. Complete the entire scenario. 2. Fill out the template attached below, ask your professor for details on submission. 3. Compose the last question on the template reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions: Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented? Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why? Which ethical theory would you use to support your stance? Why does this theory work 4. Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance. 5. Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources. TEMPLATE Week 9 Scenario and Reflection Essay Write your introduction. Tell us what the paper is about. Provide a solid paragraph. If you use any sources here, be sure to cite them. The correct citations for the resources I have provided below are: (Pence, 2021) or (Pence, 2021, p. #) if you are quoting for the textbook. The second paragraph should cover how you feel about the topic and why. Consider the following questions. Did you have any views on the issue prior to viewing the scenario? If so, what were they? Did they change over the course of listening to the arguments? If so, how? The third paragraph should cover which of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why. This is where you need to be sure to support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics (Care Ethics, Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, Social Contract Ethics [Hobbes, Rousseau or Rawls version of the Social Contract], Act Utilitarianism, or Rule Utilitarianism [not just utilitarianism – this is wrong] to defend your stance. Refer back to the material covered in Week 1.
