Description Hi can you knock this out today :) 1 attachments Slide 1 of 1 attachment_1 attachment_ ...
Description Hi can you knock this out today :) 1 attachments Slide 1 of 1 attachment_1 attachment_1 UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Leadership in Diverse and Multicultural Organizations Summative Assessment: Outline & Rubric Summative Assessment Outline Global Cultures Case Analysis Competency Name: Leadership in Diverse and Multicultural Organizations Competency Statement: Demonstrate an understanding of leadership in the context of diverse and multicultural organizations. Summative Assessment Submission Title: Global Cultures Case Analysis Competency Objectives: 1. Examine the importance and impact of diversity in organizations with multicultural locations including employees, suppliers and/or customers. 2. Compare and contrast the similarities and differences among global cultures. 3. Understand the importance of cultural intelligence (CQ) to leadership effectiveness. 4. Develop an understanding of leadership best practices in diverse and multicultural organizations. Program Learning Outcomes: PLO 3 - Global: Apply cultural differences, diversity issues, and business functions and processes, in domestic and global settings. Institutional Learning Outcomes: ILO 4 - Global Cultures: Explain the relationship between a global issue and the history, values, politics, economy, communication styles, or beliefs and practices of one or more cultures affected by that issue. Purpose of this Assessment Your organization is considering opening a facility in another country. For this assignment, you will choose a country, analyze the culture of that country, and assess how the country’s beliefs, values and norms will impact operating a facility. You will demonstrate your ability to use the tools and resources identified in this competency as well as additional scholarly resources. Items Required for Submission The item required for submission is a five – six page, double-spaced paper (excluding title page and references). APA style is required. Step ONE: Preparation ? As part of a team examining the feasibility of opening an international facility for your organization, you have been asked to research and analyze the culture of a specific country to prepare a report that describes shared beliefs, values and norms, and assesses their implications Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric 1 Leadership in Diverse and Multicultural Organizations Summative Assessment: Outline & Rubric for locating a facility in that country. Because your organization is considering several different regions of the world, select one of the following countries to research: Brazil China El Salvador ? ? Ghana India Malaysia Mexico Philippines Poland South Korea Spain Turkey Using three or more scholarly sources, in addition to the Hofstede website, research the culture of the selected country to identify significant cultural beliefs, values and norms. Apply Hofstede’s four, out of six, cultural dimensions to your selected country. You can research this information using The Hofstede Insights Country Comparison Tool. Step TWO: Complete Written Report The written report must include the following information: ? Explain why understanding cultural differences in the global economy is an important issue for businesses today. ? Identify a minimum of four significant cultural beliefs, values and norms for a selected country. ? Compare and contrast the selected country with the United States based on Hofstede’s four, out of six, cultural dimensions of individualism versus collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity versus femininity. ? Assess the advantages and challenges of opening a facility in the selected country. ? Integrate and synthesize data from multiple sources and be sure to cite the sources. ? Demonstrate an understanding of cultural intelligence (CQ). Recommend two strategies to enhance the cultural intelligence of U.S. leaders who manage the facilities in this country. Include, in the evidence, managers’ attitudes that are open to perspectives, values, beliefs and norms different from those identified in Hofstede’s framework. ? Use three or more scholarly references (preferably peer-reviewed journals from UMass Global’s virtual library), competency readings and The Hofstede Insights website. ? Include citations, use correct spelling, grammar and punctuation, and adhere to APA standards. Step Three: Complete Checklist for Submission Before you submit your work, check to see if you have met the criteria noted below. Did you: Explain why understanding cultural differences in the global economy is an important issue for businesses today. Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric 2 Leadership in Diverse and Multicultural Organizations Summative Assessment: Outline & Rubric Demonstrate accurate understanding of the similarities and differences between/among members of more than one culture in relation to history, values, politics, economy, communications styles, or beliefs and practices? Consistently demonstrate the ability to integrate divergent facts and data from multiple sources? Comprehensively discuss significant cultural beliefs, values and norms in the selected country? Use Hofstede’s cultural dimensions to compare and contrast the selected country and the United States? Accurately assess the advantages and challenges of opening a facility in the selected country? Demonstrate the importance of cultural intelligence, especially in regard to the roles of U.S. leaders managing facilities in the selected country? Use three or more scholarly sources, competency readings and The Hofstede Center to support your case analysis? Check that your paper is logical, well-written, and the required length? Check spelling, grammar and punctuation, APA formatting standards, and citations and reference page? Step FIVE: Submit Your Work ? Your completed files should be submitted through the Final Assessment page of your competency. Scoring Rubric for Final Assessment Criterion ILO - Global Issue ILO Knowledge EMERGING (1) Demonstrates no greater than surface understanding of a global issue. Demonstrates surface understanding of the similarities and differences between/among members of more than one culture in relation to Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric DEVELOPING (2) Demonstrates partial understanding of a global issue. PROFICIENT (3) Demonstrates adequate understanding of a global issue. EXEMPLARY (4) Demonstrates accurate understanding of a global issue. Demonstrates partial understanding of the similarities and differences between/among members of more than one culture in Demonstrates adequate understanding of the similarities and differences between/amo ng members of more than one culture in Demonstrates accurate understanding of the similarities and differences between/among members of more than one culture in relation to history, values, politics, 3 Leadership in Diverse and Multicultural Organizations Summative Assessment: Outline & Rubric Criterion ILO - Synthesis ILO - Cultural Intelligence PLO - Cultural Beliefs, Values and Norms PLO – Cultural Dimensions EMERGING (1) history, values, politics, economy, communications styles, or beliefs and practices. Demonstrates a lack of ability to integrate divergent facts and data from multiple sources. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the importance of cultural intelligence in leadership roles. Does not include any strategies to enhance cultural intelligence of U.S. leaders in the selected country. Limited, if any, identification of significant cultural beliefs, values and norms in the selected country. May not use or apply Hofstede’s cultural dimensions correctly to compare and contrast the selected country and the United States. Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric DEVELOPING (2) relation to history, values, politics, economy, communications styles, or beliefs and practices. Demonstrates a partial ability to integrate divergent facts and data from multiple sources. PROFICIENT (3) relation to history, values, politics, economy, communications styles, or beliefs and practices. Demonstrates an adequate ability to integrate divergent facts and data from multiple sources. EXEMPLARY (4) economy, communications styles, or beliefs and practices. Consistently demonstrates the ability to integrate divergent facts and data from multiple sources Demonstrates a Demonstrates an Comprehensively partial adequate demonstrates an understanding of understanding of understanding of the importance of the importance of the importance of cultural intelligence cultural intelligence cultural intelligence in leadership roles. in leadership roles. in leadership roles. Includes only 1 Includes 2 Includes 2 or more strategy to enhance strategies to strategies to cultural intelligence enhance cultural enhance cultural of U.S. leaders in intelligence of U.S. intelligence of U.S. the selected leaders in the leaders in the country. selected country. selected country. Identifies some Fairly Comprehensively cultural beliefs, comprehensively discusses significant values and norms in discusses significant cultural beliefs, the selected values and norms in cultural beliefs, country which may values and the selected or may not be country. norms in the significant. selected country. Using Hofstede’s Using Hofstede’s Using Hofstede’s cultural cultural cultural dimensions, dimensions, dimensions, compares and compares and compares and contrasts the contrasts the contrasts the selected selected selected country and the country and the country and the United United States. United States. Four More than four States, although 4 Leadership in Diverse and Multicultural Organizations Summative Assessment: Outline & Rubric Criterion EMERGING (1) DEVELOPING (2) the analysis may be superficial or incorrect. Three or less dimensions are compared and contrasted. PROFICIENT (3) dimensions are compared and contrasted. EXEMPLARY (4) dimensions are compared and contrasted. PLO – Facility Advantages and Challenges Limited, if any assessment of the advantages and challenges of opening a facility in the selected country. Somewhat assesses the advantages and challenges of opening a facility in the selected country. Fairly accurately assesses the advantages and challenges of opening a facility in the selected country. Accurately assesses the advantages and challenges of opening a facility in the selected country. Writing Mechanics The paper lacks clarity and may be confusing; too long or short. Numerous errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. Uses two or fewer sources to support case analysis. Limited if any adherence to APA standards. The paper is logical, well-written, and the required length. There may be one or two minor errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. Uses two or three scholarly sources, competency readings and the Hofstede Center to support case analysis. APA formatting standards are followed with a few minor errors. The paper is logical, well written, and the required length. Spelling, grammar and punctuation are accurate. References and APA Standards The paper is somewhat logical and well-written; too long or short. Some errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. Uses two or three sources, competency readings, and the Hofstede Center to support case analysis. APA standards are somewhat followed but with numerous errors. Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric Uses three or more scholarly sources, competency readings and The Hofstede Center to support case analysis. APA formatting standards are followed; citations and reference page are correct. 5
